Citation: R v Polutele [2020] NSWDC 33
Court: District Court of New South Wales
Date: 27 February 2020
Judge: Harris DCJ
Background
The offender was driving north along Forresters Road, St Marys, at approximately 9.20pm on 20 August 2018 when his Jeep Cherokee struck 19-year-old Isaac Watson, who had cycled into the intersection of Griffiths Street. Mr Watson was killed instantly and his body was thrown approximately 68 metres from the point of impact.
CCTV footage and expert collision reconstruction evidence established that the offender was travelling at approximately 108 kilometres per hour in a 60 km/h zone, placing him 48 kilometres per hour over the speed limit. No mechanical defect contributed to the collision, and there was no evidence the offender had applied the brakes before impact.
The offender pleaded guilty to dangerous driving occasioning death in circumstances of aggravation under s 52A(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), the aggravating circumstance being that he exceeded the speed limit by more than 45 kilometres per hour. At the time of the offence he was also on a good behaviour bond for a road-related offence and had never held a driving licence.
Legal Issues
- What is the appropriate head sentence and non-parole period for an aggravated dangerous driving occasioning death offence under s 52A(2), having regard to the guideline judgments in R v Jurisic and R v Whyte?
- What weight should be given to general deterrence, the offender's personal circumstances (including PTSD, anxiety, youth, and remorse), and the utilitarian value of a guilty plea?
- Whether special circumstances existed to justify departing from the standard statutory ratio between the non-parole period and the head sentence.
- What action, if any, should be taken for breach of the offender's existing good behaviour bond?
Decision
Harris DCJ identified general deterrence as the primary sentencing consideration, noting the grave risk dangerous driving poses to other road users. The court applied the guideline framework from Whyte, which confirmed that where an offender's moral culpability is high, a full-time custodial head sentence of less than three years will not generally be appropriate for a s 52A offence. Because the offender was charged under the aggravated form of the provision (s 52A(2)), an upward increment beyond that baseline was required.
On the objective seriousness of the offence, the court accepted that the speed of 48 km/h over the limit placed the offender just above the threshold for the aggravated offence, and did not characterise the excess as substantially beyond that threshold. The court took into account the victim impact statement delivered by Mr Watson's mother, Crystal Watson, acknowledging the profound loss she described.
In assessing the offender's subjective circumstances, the court noted he was a young man with no prior criminal convictions, had entered a guilty plea (attracting a utilitarian discount), and suffered from PTSD and anxiety. The court found special circumstances under the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, adjusting the statutory ratio of the non-parole period to the total sentence to approximately 56.4 percent, on the basis that the offender would benefit from supervision and treatment of his mental health conditions and that this was his first experience in custody.
Regarding the breach of good behaviour bond, the court noted the breach as a relevant factor in determining the overall sentence but decided, having regard to the sentence already imposed, that no separate action was warranted.
Orders Made
- Convicted of dangerous driving occasioning death in circumstances of aggravation (s 52A(2), Crimes Act 1900).
- Sentenced to 3 years and 3 months imprisonment, commencing 21 February 2020 and expiring 20 May 2023.
- Non-parole period of 22 months; earliest eligible release date 20 December 2021.
- Disqualified from driving a motor vehicle for 3 years from the date of release from custody.
- No separate action taken on the breach of good behaviour bond.
Key Takeaways
- The District Court confirmed that the Whyte guideline, which discourages head sentences below three years where moral culpability is high, applies to s 52A(1) offences, and that an additional increment is required for the aggravated form under s 52A(2) to reflect the higher maximum penalty and generally higher culpability.
- Excess speed that only marginally exceeds the 45 km/h threshold for aggravation (here, 48 km/h over the limit) does not automatically attract the same severity as cases where the excess is substantially greater, and the sentencing court treated that distinction as relevant to the overall assessment.
- Special circumstances justifying an adjusted non-parole period were established where the offender was a young, first-time custodial detainee with diagnosed PTSD and anxiety disorders who stood to benefit from structured supervision and mental health treatment upon release.
- General deterrence was identified as the primary sentencing purpose in dangerous driving occasioning death matters, consistent with the approach taken across the case law in this area.
- Where a sentencing judge has already imposed a term of imprisonment that adequately reflects a concurrent bond breach, the court retains a discretion to take no separate action on that breach.
Legislation and Cases Referenced
Legislation
- Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 52A(2)
- Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 3A
Cases
- R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209
- R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252
- R v Smith (2016) NSWCCA 75
- R v McKeown [2013] NSWDC 22
- R v Elkassir [2013] NSWCCA 181
- Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218
- R v Dhanhoa [2000] NSWCCA 257
- R v Elyard [2006] NSWCCA 43
- R v Howcher [2004] NSWCCA 179
- R v Manok [2017] NSWCCA 232
- R v Ryan [2003] NSWCCA 202
- R v Musumeci (unreported, 30 October 1997)